Loophole in the Lions organisation and perhaps other Charitable organisations.

 

 

向下滚动查看中文

I am collating information from my blog posts to write an open letter to Lions Clubs International on club autonomy and the loopholes it creates for those with criminal intent.

This is what I read in my post in November 2016. “A conspiracy consists …in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act or to do lawful act by unlawful means.”

All members of the Centennial Club of Kota Kinabalu who have not complained to ROS and/or LCI about the criminal act of the club falsifying records have, by the definition above, conspired to do an unlawful act.

This would apply to the DG Annie Ho and all PDGs I have written to.

It took me one year to get the Lions Club of Kota Kinabalu Host be de-registered by ROS. LCI had then said that I could not complain to them as a non-member. The anonymity of clubs is well known by Lions members, many (not all) of whom take advantage of it to commit criminal acts.

In 2017, ROS had an impartial director. This time around, the director of ROS is standing behind ‘anonymous’ status as they have been duped and unwilling to face the truth.

The blog post highlights the importance of accurate meeting minutes and the legal implications of improperly recorded proceedings. The key points are:

Minutes must accurately reflect what was discussed and decided at a meeting. Inaccurate or fabricated minutes can have serious legal consequences.

The act of proposing and seconding motions holds significant weight, as it indicates agreement and endorsement of the actions being taken.

The anonymity provided to local Lions Clubs can create loopholes that allow those with criminal intent to exploit the system. Specifically:

The ability of club leaders to falsify or manipulate meeting minutes enables unlawful acts to be cloaked in an appearance of legitimacy.

The reluctance of other members to formally complain or report such actions, even if aware of them, could potentially be construed as a form of conspiracy.

The challenge of external oversight and accountability, especially for non-members trying to report issues, highlights the need for stronger governance and transparency within the Lions Club organisation.

To address these concerns, the Lions Clubs International should consider implementing stronger controls and auditing procedures to ensure the integrity of local chapter operations. This could include:

Establishing clear guidelines for non-members to report misconduct.

Empowering district and international leadership to investigate and address complaints in a timely and impartial manner.

 

By closing these loopholes, the Lions organisation can better uphold the ethical standards and community service values it espouses. Fostering a culture of transparency and accountability is crucial to maintaining public trust and fulfilling its noble mission.

 我正在整理我博客上的信息,以便给国际狮子会写一封公开信,谈谈俱乐部自治权和它为那些有犯罪意图的人创造的漏洞。

我在2016年11月的一篇文章中读到:"共谋是两个或两个以上人达成协议,去进行一项非法行为或以非法手段进行一项合法行为。"

所有未向ROS和/或LCI投诉科他那巴鲁市狮子会百年俱乐部有犯罪行为伪造记录的成员,根据上述定义,都已经共谋进行了一项非法行为。

这将适用于我已经写信给的DG Annie Ho和所有前任区长。

这突出了会议、提议和附议的重要性。

我花了一年时间才让科他那巴鲁市狮子会东主俱乐部被ROS除名。LCI当时说,作为非会员,我不能向他们投诉。俱乐部的匿名性是众所周知的,许多(但不是全部)狮子会成员利用它来犯罪。

2017年,ROS有一名公正的董事。这一次,ROS的董事站在"匿名"地位后面,因为他们被蒙蔽了,不愿面对事实。

这篇博文强调了准确会议纪要的重要性,以及不当记录程序的法律影响。关键要点是:

会议纪要必须准确反映会议上讨论和决定的内容。不准确或伪造的会议纪要可能会产生严重的法律后果。

提议和附议动议的行为具有重大影响,因为它表示同意和支持所采取的行动。

当地狮子会俱乐部享有的匿名性可能会造成漏洞,让那些有犯罪意图的人利用这一系统。具体来说:

俱乐部领导人伪造或操纵会议纪要的能力,使得非法行为可以掩盖在合法性的外表之下。

其他成员不愿正式投诉或报告此类行为,即使知道这些行为,也可能被解释为一种共谋。

外部监督和问责的困难,特别是非会员试图报告问题时,突出了狮子会组织内部需要更强的治理和透明度。

为了解决这些问题,国际狮子会应该考虑实施更强有力的控制和审计程序,以确保当地分会运营的完整性。这可能包括:

建立非会员报告不当行为的明确指引。

赋予区和国际领导层及时和公正地调查和解决投诉的权力。

通过堵塞这些漏洞,狮子会组织可以更好地维护其所宣扬的道德标准和社区服务价值观。培养透明度和问责制的文化,对于维护公众信任、履行崇高使命至关重要。