I transcribe
below the letter from Kim Goldsworthy for easy reading.
Dear
Mr.Luqman Michel,
In reply to
your PDF Documents.
I am
flabbergasted that my NAME and my PHOTOGRAPH has been used where I have never
*confirmed* any such writings.
·
I
have never dealt with “The Lions
Club of Kota Kinabalu Host”
·
I
have never read the bylaws of “Lions
Club of Kota Kinabalu Host.”
·
I
do not know who “Lion Francis Liew”
is (i.e. the signer of the document).
I have
clipped the text from your “notification”.
Kim Goldsworthy, an authority and a panelist on Roberts Rules
Questions and Answers Forum have confirmed on 19.11.2016 at 4.28pm all those public
postings is sufficient to conclude Luqman Michel’s unworthiness of membership
and no further due process is required.
Please
inform your organization that I never
read a single line of any of your (Luqman Michel) Facebook page postings. – I object
to the phrase “… all those public
postings are sufficient …” I never read any public postings. I never “confirmed”
that “those postings” were “sufficient”.
·
I
CAN confirm that writings CAN be sufficient evidence in a disciplinary
process but I am in no position to confirm anyone's specific postings
were, or were not, "sufficient"- Someone would have to read the text. -
And then someone would have to judge the text. I never read a single
word of such a postig.
·
In a
disciplinary process, a parliamentarian is not a judge of a thing. – The organization
is to be the judge of such a thing.
I find it
dishonourable that:
(a) My good name has been used without my
permission.
(b) In a cause I did not know about;
(c) And my (never even quoted) reply to a
generic question was misunderstood, and then twisted to a invalid
interpretation.
Sincerely,
